Semiotic of Female Masculinity in Videogame 'The Last of Us Part II'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52187/rdt.v3i1.86Keywords:
sign, female masculinity, videogameAbstract
This study aims to interpret the signs of semiotics in the videogame The Last of Us Part II (TLOU Part II) which reflect the values of female masculinity initiated by Judith Halberstam (1998). Through Roland Barthes' (1977) semiotics theory, this study analyzes the denotative and connotative meanings of visual and verbal signs from the characters of the videogame TLOU Part II. The source of this research data comes from screenshots of the videogame walkthrough which is then focused into 12 data for qualitative descriptive analysis. The 12 data were analyzed for their denotative and connotative meanings, then followed by description of the female masculinity category initiated by Judith Halberstam. From this study it was found that the 2 characters studied, namely Ellie and Abby, each fulfill several of the 5 categories of female masculinity initiated by Judith Halberstam, namely Butch Realness, Femme Pretender, Male Mimicry, Fag Drag, and Denaturalized Masculinity through visual and verbal signs from video games. They each show the appearance, gesture, nature, culture, and ideology of female masculinity
References
Barthes, R. (1977). Elements of semiology. Macmillan.
Bouzida, F. (2014). The semiology analysis in media studies: Roland Barthes Approach. Proceedings of SOCIOINT14-International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 1001–1007.
Bridges, T., & Tober, T. L. (2017). The sociological explanation for why men in America turn gun violence. Qz.Com. https://qz.com/1095247/the-sociological-explanation-for-why-men-in-america-turn-to-gun-violence/
Chafetz, J. S. (1978). Masculine, feminine or human?: an overview of the sociology of the gender roles.
Darwin, M. (2001). Maskulinitas: Posisi laki-laki dalam masyarakat patriakis. Jurnal Center For Population And Policy Studies, Volume 8 No. 1, Gadjah Mada University, 88–88. https://lakilakibaru.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/S281_Muhadjir-Darwin_Maskulinitas-Posisi-Laki-laki-dalam-Masyarakat-Patriarkis.pdf
Frayer, D. W. (1981). Body size, weapon use, and natural selection in the European Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic. American Anthropologist, 83(1), 57–73.
Halberstam, J. (1998). 1. An Introduction to Female Masculinity: Masculinity without Men. In Female masculinity (pp. 1–44). Duke University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pease, A. (1984). Body language.–(Overcoming common problems). Sheldon Press.
Pringle, R. (2005). Masculinities, sport, and power: A critical comparison of Gramscian and Foucauldian inspired theoretical tools. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29(3), 256–278.
Seiter, E. (1992). Semiotics, structuralism and television. Channels of Discourse, Reassembled, 31–66.
